A comparative study of the reproductive traits and clustering analysis among different pig breeds


Keywords: the reproductive traits, Cluster Analysis, Principal Component Analysis, interbreeding combinations, pig.

Abstract

The data were from 149 pigs from seven pig genetic groups raised in «Tavriys'ki Svyni» Ltd (Kherson region, Ukraine). The following genetic groups were included in our analyses: LW × LW (n = 19), LW × LN (n = 43), LW × PT (n = 13), LN × LN (n = 15), UM × LN (n = 23), UM × PT (n = 17) and UM×UM (n = 16). The objective this work was evaluation of animal reproductive traits using multivariate analysis. Variables measured and derived included total no. piglets born (TNB), no. piglets born alive (NBA), freq. of stillborn piglets (FSB), total litter birth weight (TLBW), average piglet birth weight (APBW), pre-weaning mortality in piglets (PWM), no. weaned piglets (NW), total weaning weight of litter (TWWL) and average piglet weaning weight (APWW). After standardization, multivariate analyses (Cluster analysis and Principal Component Analysis) were carried out using STATISTICA (StatSoft Ltd.) to place pig interbreeding combinations in groups in accordance with their degree of similarity and verify discriminatory capacity of the original traits in the formation of these groups. The tree diagram showed clear distances between the pig genetic groups studied. In the tree diagram obtained from the analysis of the distances between interbreeding combinations, two distinct groups (clusters) were seen, one with UM × LN and UM × UM animals, and the other with the rest of the pig genetic groups in the study. The eigenvalues for the first two Principal Components (PC1 and PC2) together accounted for near 65% of the variance of the pig’s reproductive traits. The first principal component (PC1) explained 34.9% total variation. It was represented by significant positive loadings for TNB, NBA and TLBW. The second principal component (PC2) accounted for an additional 29.7% of the generalized variance and was represented by significant loadings for NW, TWWL and APWW. Thus, PC1 defined no. piglets and total litter birth weight, while PC2 represented no. weaned piglets and total weaning weight of litter. In conclusion, the multivariate methods (Cluster Analysis and PCA) has been proven to be a very effective method to obtain a synthetic judgment of reproductive traits in pig.

References

Arandas, J.K.G., da Silva, N.M.V., Nascimento, R.B., Filho, E.C.P., de Albuquerque Brasil, L.H., & Ribeiro, M.N. (2017). Multivariate analysis as a tool for phe-notypic characterization of an endangered breed. Journal of Applied Animal Research. 45(1), 152–158. doi: 10.1080/09712119.2015.112535

Berezovskyi, M.D., Popova, V.M., Tsyryk, K.O., & Ohurenko, V.S. (2012). Vidtvoriuvalni yakosti svynomatok v systemi hibrydyzatsii. Svynarstvo. 60, 21–24 (in Ukrainian).

Biensen, N.J., Haussmann, M.F., Lay, D.C., Christian, L.L., & Ford, S.P. (1999). The relationship between placental and piglet birth weights and growth traits. Animal Scienc. 68(4), 709–715. doi: 10.1017/S1357729800050736

Delgado, J.V., Barba, C., Rodero, A., Dieguez, E., Canue-lo, P., & Herrera, M. (2000). Morphological character-ization of the Iberian pig branch based on quantitative traits. In: Almeida J.A. & Tirapicos Nunes J. (eds.). Tradition and innovation in Mediterranean pig production. Zaragoza: CIHEAM, 63–66.

Fahmy, M.H., & Bernard, C.S. (1972). Interrelations between some reproductive traits in swine. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 52(1), 39–45. doi: 10.4141/cjas72-004

Franci, O., Pugliese, C., Bozzi, R., Acciaioli, A., & Parisi, G. (2001). The use of multivariate analysis for evalu-ating relationships among fat depots in heavy pigs of different genotypes. Meat Science. 58(3), 259–266. doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(00)00163-7

Halafyan, A.A. (2007). STATISTICA 6. Statisticheskij analiz dannyh. M.: OOO «Binom-Press» (in Russian).

Herasymenko, V.V. (2008). Do pytannia pro vykorystan-nia indeksiv henetychnoi skhozhosti v selektsii silsko-hospodarskykh tvaryn. Naukovyi visnyk «Askaniia-Nova». 1, 107–113 (in Ukrainian).

Gregory, N.G., & Whelehan, O.P. (1983). Skull shape in relation to carcass fatness in pigs. Journal of the Sci-ence of Food and Agriculture. 34(12), 1397–1403. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2740341213

Gruzewska, A., Biesiada-Drzazga, B., & Markowska, M. (2009). Application of multidimensional comparative analysis in comparing commercial broiler chicken lines. Archiv fur Geflugelkunde. 73(2), 132–138.

Czycholl, I., Beilage, E.G., Henning, C., & Krieter, J. (2017). Reliability of the qualitative behavior assess-ment as included in the Welfare Quality Assessment protocol for growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science. 95(8), 3445–3454. doi: 10.2527/jas.2017.1525

Gupta, A.K., Kumar, S., Pal, Y., Brahmane, M., Kumar, B., et al. (2017). Phenotypic Clustering of Indian Donkey Population Belonging to Six Agro-Climatic Regions. Journal of Biodiversity & Endangered Spe-cies. 5, 201. doi: 10.4172/2332-2543.1000201

Hu, Y., Suzuki, T., Noguchi, G., Li, Y., Kitamura, Y., & Satake, T. (2006). Study on evaluation of carcass traits and pork quality using principal component analysis. Nogyo Shisetsu (Journal of the Society of Agricultural Structures, Japan). 37(4), 173–182. doi: 10.11449/sasj1971.37.173

Karlsson, A. (1992). The use of principal component analysis (PCA) for evaluating results from pig meat quality measurements. Meat science. 31(4), 423–433. doi: 10.1016/0309-1740(92)90025-Y

Katerynych, O. (2012). Minlyvist «nesuchosti» v onto-henezi u indykiv krosu «Kharkivskyi». Tvarynnytstvo Ukrainy. 4, 23–26 (in Ukrainian).

Kramarenko, S., Kuzmicheva, N., & Kramarenko, A. (2017). Principal component analysis of the exterior traits in dairy cows. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies. 19(79), 48–52. doi: 10.15421/nvlvet7910

Lazarevich, А.N., Efimova, L.V., & Ivanova, O.V. (2016). Analysis of the effectiveness crossing of hybrid sows with thoroughbred and terminal sires. In the World of Scientific Discoveries. 12(84), 108–129. doi: 10.12731/wsd-2016-12-108-129

Leonidov, I.N., Kozlikin, A.V. & Lodianov, V.V. (2016). Reproductive, fattening and meat qualities of young pigs at using boars of specialized breeds and types. Polythematic online scientific journal of Kuban State Agrarian University. 122(8), 1–10. doi: 10.21515/1990-4665-122-008

McManus, C., Castanheira, M., Paiva, S.R., Louvandini, H., Fioravanti, M.C.S., Paludo, G.R., et al. (2011). Use of multivariate analyses for determining heat tol-erance in Brazilian cattle. Tropical animal health and production. 43(3), 623–630. doi: 10.1007/s11250-010-9742-8

Okoro, V.M., Ogundu, U.E., Okani, M., Oziri, I., Eneowo, O., Olisenekwu, O.T., et al. (2015). Principal Component Analysis of Conformation and Blood Marker Traits at Pre-and Post-Weaning Stages of Growth in F2 Crossbred Nigerian Indigenous × Land-race Pigs. Animal biotechnology. 26(4), 243–250. doi: 10.1080/10495398.2015.1014043

Ros-Freixedes, R., Sadler, L.J., Onteru, S.K., Smith, R.M., Young, J.M., Johnson, A.K., et al. (2014). Relationship between gilt behavior and meat quality using principal component analysis. Meat science. 96(1), 264–269. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.07.004

Shebanin, V.S., Melnyk, S.I., Kramarenko, S.S. & Gan-ganov, V.M. (2008). Analiz struktury populiatsii. My-kolaiv: MDAU (in Ukrainian).

Van Steenbergen, E.J. (1989). Description and evaluation of a linear scoring system for exterior traits in pigs. Livestock Production Science. 23(1–2), 163–181. doi: 10.1016/0301-6226(89)90012-2

Vovk, V.O. (2011). Reproduktyvni yakosti svynomatok riznykh henotypiv pry chystoporodnomu rozvedenni ta skhreshchuvanni. Svynarstvo. 59, 32–35 (in Ukrainian).

Young, L.D., Johnson, R.K., & Omtvedt, I.T. (1977). An Analysis of the Dependency Structure between a Gilt's Prebreeding and Reproductive Traits. II. Principal Component Analysis 1. Journal of Animal Science. 44(4), 565–570. doi: 10.2527/jas1977.444565x

Young, L.D., Pumfrey, R.A., Cunningham, P.J., & Zim-merman, D.R. (1978). Heritabilities and genetic and phenotypic correlations for prebreeding traits, repro-ductive traits and principal components. Journal of Animal Science. 46(4), 937–949. doi: 10.2527/jas1978.464937x

Abstract views: 1
PDF Downloads: 1
Published
2018-03-28
How to Cite
Kramarenko, S., Lugovoy, S., Lykhach, A., Kramarenko, A., & Lykhach, V. (2018). A comparative study of the reproductive traits and clustering analysis among different pig breeds. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies. Series: Agricultural Sciences, 20(84), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.15421/nvlvet8404