Growth and development of bees using organic acids and probiotics


  • I. V. Dmitruk Vinnytsya National Agrarian University
  • S. M. Suhovuha Vinnytsya National Agrarian University
Keywords: bee, queen, ambrosia, brood, lactobacilli, succinic acid, citric acid, feeding, egg production, research

Abstract

The second record number of sealed brood, which took place on May 15 showed that consumption of succinic acid pergi helped increase the number of brood grown by 11.2% (P <0.001) and in the experimental group. Feeding bees use citric acid positively affects the amount of brood in the second experimental group. Compared with controls, the number of brood is higher by 7.5% (P < 0.001). Use of feeding bees III experimental group of lactic acid bacteria has increased the brood at 10.0% (P < 0.001). May 27 The difference between the number of counted squares and the control and experimental group is 16.3% (P <0.001), the second experimental group 11.5% (P < 0.001), the third experimental group 13.4% (P < 0.001). In the period, which fell on June 8 development of bee colonies increased, so the difference between the number of counted squares and the control and development of 22.2% (P < 0.001), the second experimental group 17.8% (P < 0.001), the third research group 18.9% (P < 0.001). June 20, recorded the best performance of the experimental group, the difference between the number of counted squares and the control and experimental group is 23.1% (P < 0.001), the second experimental group 18.3% (P < 0.001), the third experimental group 19.3 % (P < 0.001). Compared with the rate on May 3 yaytsenosnosti intensity oviposition of the uterus and research group for 27 May increased by 62.5%. Consumption pergi bees II nd experimental group caused an increase yaytsenosnosti cancer – by 56.3%, the third second experimental group by 58.2%. Compared to control subjects in increasing the number of families found grown brood on 18,2 23,1% (P <0.001).

References

Brovars'kyj, V.D., Bagrij, I.G. (1995). Rozvedennja ta utrymannja bdzhil. K.: Urozhaj (in Ukrainian).

Koval's'kyj, Ju.V., Kyryliv, Ja.I. (2013). Rist, rozvytok i produktyvni pokaznyky bdzholynyh simej pry vykorystanni probiotykiv. Metodychni rekomendacii'. L'viv (in Ukrainian).

Vlizlo, V.V., Fedoruk, R.S., Ratych, I.B. (2012). Laboratorni metody doslidzhen' u biologii', tvarynnyctvi ta veterynarnij medycyni. Dovidnyk. L'viv, SPOLOM. (in Ukrainian).

Levchenko, I.A., Bondar', L.K. (1983). Belkovye podkormki pchelam. Pchelovodstvo.12, 9 (in Rus?-an).

Mishukovskaja, G.S. (2008). Fiziologicheskie aspekti primenenija biostimuljatorov dlja reguljacii proces sov razvitija organizma pleli medonosnoj (Apis mellifera L.) v ontogeneze: dis. dok. biol. nauk: 03.00.13. Mishukovskaja Galina Sergeevna. Ufa (in Russian).

Progunkov, V.V. (2001). Fiziologija nektarovydelenija. Pchelovodstvo. 5, 26‒27 (in Russian).

Szymas, B., Landowska, A., Kazimierczak, M. (2012). Histological structure of the Midgut of honey bees ( Apis MelliferaL.) Feed Pollen Substitutes Fortified with Probiotics. Journal of Apicultural Science. 56(1), 5‒12.

Abstract views: 18
PDF Downloads: 135
Published
2016-10-28
How to Cite
Dmitruk, I., & Suhovuha, S. (2016). Growth and development of bees using organic acids and probiotics. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies. Series: Agricultural Sciences, 18(2), 85–89. https://doi.org/10.15421/nvlvet6719