Reaction of stomach for feeding young pigs probiotics


  • E. G. Trachuk Vinnytsya National Agrarian University
  • T. V. Farionik Vinnytsya National Agrarian University
Keywords: pigs, young pigs, feeding, feed supplements, probiotics, Entero–activet stomach, morphological parameters stomach

Abstract

The basis for the diets of pigs of different technologies of production and productivity in all areas and forage species are of plant origin, which is associated primarily with their availability. This group consists of feed grain cereals, grain legumes, green coarse, juicy, waste flour and other technical industries and others. Although omnivorous pig feed them digestion features displayed on the feasibility of forming foundations diet of concentrated feed. For industrial production of pork proportion of concentrated feed often 100%. However, partly in used feed feeding that are of poor quality, which in turn worsens their nutritional value and complicates digestion and nutrient absorption of food. Besides the low digestibility of grain mixtures in which a third of organic matter is not absorbed by the animals, lack of nutrients adversely affect the resistance and other reactions, reproductive function and performance. Studying the formative influence of the new feed factor on the structure of the digestive system of animals must pay attention to the morphological features of individual organs as the result of direct exposure to chemicals in the diet of the wall of the gastrointestinal tract. The effect of different doses of probiotic preparation Entero–active  in growing young pigs on morphological indicators of cardiac, fundic and pyloric stomach areas and established its laws. The data indicate a probable thickening of the stomach wall for probiotic action by thickening  muscle and mucous membranes in all investigated areas. The changes have no pathological character, and show an adaptive response to the action of gastric certain doses of the new feed factor.

References

Avtandylov, H.H. (1973). Morkhometryia v patolohyy. M.: Medytsyna (in Russian).

Boiko, N., Karhanian, A., Petenko, A. (2008). Bezpeka kormiv: biotekhnolohichni rishennia. Propozytsiia. 2, 124 –136 (in Ukrainian).

Kasatkin, S.N. (1968). Formoobrazujushhee vlijanie sredy (pitanija) na strukturu pishhevaritel'noj sistemy. Tez. dok. VII Vses. sezda AGJe. Har'kov, 145–156 (in Russian).

Mazurenko, M.O., Kucheriavyi, V.P. (2004). Teoriia i praktyka naukovykh doslidzhen. Metodychni vkazivky z vyhotovlennia histolohichnykh preparativ orhaniv i tkanyn tvaryn. Vinnytsia: VDAU (in Ukrainian).

Naumenko, V.V., Diachynskyi, A.S., Demchenko, V.Iu., Derevianko, I.D. (2009). Fiziolohiia silsk-?hospodarskykh tvaryn: Pidruchnyk.–2–he vyd., pererob.i dopov. K.:Tsentr uchbovoi literatury (in Ukrainian).

Ovsiannykov, A.Y. (1967). Osnovy opytnogo dela v zhivotnovodstve. M.: Kolos (in Russian).

Plokhynskyi, N.A. (1969). Rukovodstvo po byometryy dlia zootekhnykov. M.: Kolos (in Russian).

Reshetnichenko, O., Orlov, L., Kriukov, B. (2012). Probiotyky v hodivli tvaryn. Tvarynnytstvo Ukrainy. 5, 25–28 (in Ukrainian).

Tsereniuk, O.M., Akimov, O.V., Kosov, M.O. (2015). Povnotsinna hodivlia svynei. Ahrobiznes sohodni. 6, 56–58 (in Ukrainian).

Yatsenko, L.I., Rak, T.M. (2011). Biolohichna rol mikroorhanizmiv u pidvyshchenni pozhyvnosti kormiv dlia svynei. Visn. Poltav. derzh. ahrar. akad. 2, 80–83.

Abstract views: 19
PDF Downloads: 64
Published
2016-10-28
How to Cite
Trachuk, E., & Farionik, T. (2016). Reaction of stomach for feeding young pigs probiotics. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies. Series: Agricultural Sciences, 18(2), 245–248. https://doi.org/10.15421/nvlvet6754