PRODUCTIVE EFFECT OF FEED ADDITIVE «PROPYGplv» IN THE DIETS OF REARING PIGS


  • J. І. Pivtorak LNUVMB named after S. Z. Gzhytskiy
  • І. М. Bogdan LNUVMB named after S. Z. Gzhytskiy
  • R. Р. Paranyak LNUVMB named after S. Z. Gzhytskiy
Keywords: repair pigs, diet, growth rate, cost of fodder, fodder supplement, productive action

Abstract

The basis of the research is tasked with the optimization of the system normalized feeding gilts by the use in the composition of the diet of biological feed additives «PROPYGplv», which contains the probiotic strains of microorganisms and ingredients of natural origin with antimicrobial action on pathogenic and conditionally pathogenic microorganisms.

It is noted that the feeding of pigs assigned for the repair of herds feed supplements on the background of complete feed at the rate of 3–4G head/day has no negative impact on the health of the animals. Positive feedback has been received intensive development and growth of animals, and confirmed the economic effectiveness of the use of supplements in feeding young pigs.

 

Author Biographies

J. І. Pivtorak, LNUVMB named after S. Z. Gzhytskiy
Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Professor
І. М. Bogdan, LNUVMB named after S. Z. Gzhytskiy
graduate student
R. Р. Paranyak, LNUVMB named after S. Z. Gzhytskiy
Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Professor

References

Nozdrin, M. T. (1991). Detalizovani normy hodivli silskohospodarskykh tvaryn. Dovidnyk/ [M. T. Nozdrin, M. M. Karpus, V. F. Karavashenko ta in.]; za redaktsii M. T. Nozdrina. – K.: Urozhai, 344. (in Ukrainian).

Karnauh, E. V., Bazaleeva, A. N. (2013). Probiotiki v korrektsii kishechnogo mikrobiotsenoza // problemi ekologichnoyi ta medichnoyi genetiki i klinichnoyi imunologiyi: zb. Nauk. Prats / Kiyivskiy natsionalniy universitet imeni Tarasa Shevchenka, Luganskiy derzhavniy medichniy unIversitet. – K., Lugansk, 1(115), 204–215. (in Russian).

Lahtin, V. M., Afanasev, S. S., Aleshkin, V. A. i dr. (2008). Strategicheskie aspektyi konstruirovaniya buduschego / Vestnik Rossiyskoy AMN. 2, 33–45. (in Russian).

Kalashkikov, A. P. (2003). Normyi i ratsionyi kormleniya selskohozyaystvennyih zhivotnyih / [Kalashkikov A. P., Kleymenov V. I., bakanov V. R. i dr.] / – M.: Agropromizdat, 352. (in Russian).

Pidhorskyi, V. S., Kovalenko, N. K. (2004). Probiotyky na osnovi molochnokyslykh bakterii – suchasnyi stan i perspektyvy: Materialy mizhnarodnoi naukovoi konferentsii. – Ternopil, 20–22 travnia 2004. – Ternopil, 3–7. (in Ukrainian).

Probiotiki i prebiotiki. Vsemirnaya gastroenterologicheskaya organizatsiya (prakticheskie rekomendatsii). 2008, 24. (in Russian).

Tarakanov, M. A. (2000). Mehanizm deystviya probiotikov na mikrofloru pischevaritelnogo travka i organizm zhivotnogo // Veterinariya. 5, 32–33. (in Russian).

Delphine, M. A. Sauliner, Jennifer, K., Spinler, Glenn, Gibson, R. et cal. (2009). Mechanisms of Probiosis and Prebiosis: Considerations for Enhanced Functional Foods // NIH Public Accens Author Manuscript. 20 (2), 135–141.

Silvia Wilson Gratz, Hannu Mykkanen, Hani S El–Nesami. (2010). Probiotics and gut health: A special focus on liver diseases // Worid Journal of Gastroenterology. 16 (4), 403–410.

Abstract views: 0
PDF Downloads: 0
Published
2016-04-05
How to Cite
PivtorakJ. І., BogdanІ. М., & ParanyakR. Р. (2016). PRODUCTIVE EFFECT OF FEED ADDITIVE «PROPYGplv» IN THE DIETS OF REARING PIGS. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies. Series: Agricultural Sciences, 18(1), 8-12. Retrieved from https://nvlvet.com.ua/index.php/agriculture/article/view/3491