Effect of genetic and non-genetic factors on the reproduction traits in Ukrainian Meat sows

Keywords: parity, farrowing year and month, dam line, reproduction traits, Ukrainian Meat breed, sows.


Purebred Ukrainian Meat (UM) breed pigs, which came from Limited Liability Company “Tavriyskie Svin'I” herd located in Skadovsky district (Kherson region, Ukraine), were studied. The reproduction traits investigated were total number of piglets born (TNB), number of piglets born alive (NBA), frequency of stillborn piglets (FSB), number of weaned piglets (NW), total weaning weight of litter (TWWL) and average piglet weaning weight (APWW) for sows farrowing between 2006 and 2012. The analysis covered reproductive characteristics of 49 sows in the first nine parities (n = 457 litters). The sows originated from different the UM dam lines. Two month farrowing periods (January/February, March/April, May/June, July/August, September/October, and November/December) were constructed and used for reproduction traits. Data were analyzed by use of general linear model (GLM) procedure with the statistical package MINITAB v. 15. The estimates of reproduction traits for UM sows were 10.73 ± 0.43 ind. for TNB, 9.36 ± 0.39 ind. for NBA, 10.5 ± 2.2% for FSB, 9.07 ± 0.30 ind. for NW, 128.1 ± 5.7 kg for TWWL and 14.39 ± 0.49 kg for APWW. Litter size had a nonlinear effect on probability of stillbirth; piglets from small and large litters were more susceptible to die at farrowing with a minimum probability (near 5.0%) for intermediate litters of 8–10 piglets. Results here indicate that weak genetic variation exists in different the UM dam lines for the reproduction traits. Based on the obtained results it can be concluded that influence of parity on the observed traits of litter size was highly statistically significant (P < 0.050.001). The TNB, NBA and NW decreased in the first-second parities and thereafter increased with the number of parities, reaching a maximum in parities 5 and 6. FSB was lowest in parities 2, 3 and 5. Farrowing month significantly influenced some reproduction traits also. Sows farrowing in May/June had the highest NW, TWWL and APWW.


Borges, V.F., Bernardi, M.L., Bortolozzo, F.P., & Wentz, I. (2005). Risk factors for stillbirth and foetal mummi-fication in four Brazilian swine herds. Preventive Vet-erinary Medicine, 70(3–4), 165–176. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.03.003.

Canario, L., Cantoni, E., Le Bihan, E., Caritez, J.C., Bil-lon, Y., Bidanel, J.P., & Foulley, J.L. (2006). Between-breed variability of stillbirth and its relationship with sow and piglet characteristics. Journal of Animal Science, 84(12), 3185–3196. doi: 10.2527/jas.2005-775.

Fahmy, M.H., & Bernard, C.S. (1972). Interrelations between some reproductive traits in swine. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 52(1), 39–45. doi: 10.4141/cjas72-004.

Hanenberg, E.H.A.T., Knol, E.F., & Merks, J.W.M. (2001). Estimates of genetic parameters for reproduction traits at different parities in Dutch Landrace pigs. Livestock Production Science, 69(2), 179–186. doi: 10.1016/S0301-6226(00)00258-X.

Imboonta, N., Rydhmer, L., & Tumwasorn, S. (2007). Genetic parameters for reproduction and production traits of Landrace sows in Thailand. Journal of animal science, 85(1), 53–59. doi: 10.2527/jas.2005-708.

Leenhouwers, J.I., van der Lende, T., & Knol, E.F. (1999). Analysis of stillbirth in different lines of pig. Livestock Production Science, 57(3), 243–253. doi: 10.1016/S0301-6226(98)00171-7.

Leigh, A.O. (1977). Litter performance characteristics of pigs in tropical south-western Nigeria 1. Breed differences and effects of some non-genetic sources of variation. Animal Science, 24(3), 323–331. doi: 10.1017/S0003356100011831.

Love, R.J., Evans, G., & Klupiec, C. (1993). Seasonal effects on fertility in gilts and sows. Journal of Repro-duction and Fertility. Supplement, 48, 191–206. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8145204.

Prunier, A., de Braganca, M.M., & Le Dividich, J. (1997). Influence of high ambient temperature on performance of reproductive sows. Livestock Production Science, 52(2), 123–133. doi: 10.1016/S0301-6226(97)00137-1.

Randall, G.C.B. (1978). Perinatal mortality: Some prob-lems of adaptation at birth. Advances in Veterinary Science and Comparative Medicine, 22, 53–81.

Ryan, B.F., Joiner, B.L., & Cryer, J.D. (2012). MINITAB Handbook: Update for release 16. Pacific Grove, CA, USA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co., 560 p.

Schwarz, T., Nowicki, J., & Tuz, R. (2009). Reproductive performance of Polish Large White sows in intensive production: effect of parity and season. Annals of Animal Science, 9(3), 268–277.

Southwood, O.I., & Kennedy, B.W. (1991). Genetic and environmental trends for litter size in swine. Journal of Animal Science, 69(8), 3177–3182. doi: 10.2527/1991.6983177x.

Tantasuparuk, W., Lundeheim, N., Dalin, A.M., Kunavongkrit, A., & Einarsson, S. (2000). Reproduc-tive performance of purebred Landrace and Yorkshire sows in Thailand with special reference to seasonal in-fluence and parity number. Theriogenology, 54(3), 481–496. doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00364-2.

Tummaruk, P., Lundeheim, N., Einarsson, S., & Dalin, A.M. (2001). Effect of birth litter size, birth parity number, growth rate, backfat thickness and age at first mating of gilts on their reproductive performance as sows. Animal Reproduction Science, 66(3-4), 225–237. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4320(01)00095-1.

Zaleski, H.M., & Hacker, R.R. (1993). Effect of oxygen and neostigmine on stillbirth and pig viability. Journal of Animal Science. 71(2), 298–305. doi: 10.2527/1993.712298x.

Young, L.D., Pumfrey, R.A., Cunningham, P.J., & Zim-merman, D.R. (1978). Heritabilities and genetic and phenotypic correlations for prebreeding traits, repro-ductive traits and principal components. Journal of Animal Science, 46(4), 937–949. doi: 10.2527/jas1978.464937x.

Abstract views: 54
PDF Downloads: 67
How to Cite
Kramarenko, S., Lugovoy, S., Lykhach, A., Kramarenko, A., Lykhach, V., & Slobodianyk, A. (2019). Effect of genetic and non-genetic factors on the reproduction traits in Ukrainian Meat sows. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies. Series: Agricultural Sciences, 21(90), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.32718/nvlvet-a9001

Most read articles by the same author(s)