Morphological indicaters of the gastrointestinal tract of young pigs during feeding of the PVMS “Efiprot”
The problem of increasing of livestock and poultry has led scientists to look for measures to improve productivity and reduce costs. One way to solve this problem is to use balancing supplements in the feeding. The study of feeding by protein-vitamin-mineral feed supplement “Efiprot” was carried out on three groups of young white pigs, 12 heads in each group. The experiment consisted of leveling of 15 and a basic period of 127 days. During the rearing period, the animals consumed the feed according to the growth phases, increasing the amount from 1 kg/head (8–15 kg of live weight), up to 1.5 kg/head per day (15–35 kg of live weight) and from 2 kg/head (35–65 kg of live weight) and up to 2.5 kg/head. per day (65–110 kg of live weight). While using in feeding of young pigs of PVMS “Efiprot”, a positive productive effect was obtained. Thus, when introduced to the diet of the tested yong pig the PVMS, the average daily growth of animals has increased by 33–58 g. Accordingly, has increased the final live weight of the animals by 4.05–7.18 kg against the control level. Due to the result of the studies, carrying out the control slaughter, it was found that feeding of the protein-vitamin-mineral supplement “Efiprot” for young pigs on rearing does not have a probable effect on the weight of the stomach, but causes changes in the thickness of the wall of the cardiac zone by 0.24 mm (2.75 %), and reducing the wall thickness relative to the control by 1.04 mm (11.91 %). In the fundus zone of the stomach, there is a tendency to thicken the walls due to the mucous and sere-muscular membranes by 0.36 mm (6.75 %) and 0.35 mm (6.56 %). In the study of the pyloric zone, the thickness of the walls was decreased by 0.46 mm (3.13 %) and 0.73 mm (4.97 %) compared to the control group.The reaction of the intestine to feeding of “Efiprot” to young pigs is caused by an increase in weight and length of 0.06 – 0.2 kg and 0.5 m – 0.83 m. Also it is shown a slight decrease in the thickness of the hollow shell by 0.5 mm (18.3 %) in the second group of animals 0.21 mm (7.69 %). A significant difference was found in the structure of the colon of experimental animals, where there was an increase in wall thickness in the first group by 0.13 mm (5.75 %) and a decrease in the second group by 0.16 mm (7.07 %).
Christaki, E., Giannenas, I., Bonos, E., & Florou-Paneri, P. (2020). Chapter 2 – Innovative uses of aromatic plants as natural supplements in nutrition, Feed Addi-tives, Academic Press, 2020, 19–34. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-814700-9.00002-9.
Giannenas, I., Bonos, E., Christaki, E., & Florou-Paneri, P. (2013). Essential Oils and their Applications in Animal Nutrition. Medicinal & aromatic plants, 2(6), 140. doi: 10.4172/2167-0412.1000140.
Iudina, K. Ye., & Sokolenko, V. M. (2015). Doslidzhennia protiahom KhKh stolittia protsesiv travlennia v shlunku svynei Visnyk problem biolohii i medytsyny, 1(117), 50–54 (in Ukrainian).
Khalak, V., Gutyj, B., & Stadnits’ka, O. (2019). Feeding and meat qualities of young pigs of different origin and intensity of formation in early ontogenesis. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies. Series: Agricultural Sciences, 21(91), 10–15. doi: 10.32718/nvlvet-a9102.
Khalak, V., Gutyj, B., Bordun, O., Ilchenko, M., & Horchanok, A. (2020). Effect of blood serum enzymes on meat qualities of piglet productivity. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 10(1), 158–161. doi: 10.15421/2020_25.
Kostin, A. P., Mischerekov, F. A., & Syisoev A. A. (1983). Fiziologiya selskohozyaystvennyih zhivotnyih. M.: Kolos (in Ukrainian).
Martyshuk, T. V., Gutyj, B. V., & Vishchur, O. I. (2019). Morphological and biochemical indices of piglets' blood by the action of feed additive “Butaselmevit-plus”. The Animal biology, 21(4), 65–70. doi: 10.15407/animbiol21.04.065.
Martyshuk, T. V., Gutyj, B. V., Vishchur, O. I., & Todori-uk, V. B. (2019). Biochemical indices of piglets blood under the action of feed additive “Butaselmevit-plus”. Ukrainian Journal of Veterinary and Agricultural Sci-ences, 2(2), 27–30. doi: 10.32718/ujvas2-2.06.
Mazurenko, M. O., Kucheriavyi, V. P., Hutsol, A. V. (2004). Metodychni vkazivky po vyhotovlenniu histolohichnykh preparativ orhaniv i tkanyn tvaryn. Vinnytsia: VDAU (in Ukrainian).
Mazurenko, M. O., Reminnyi, O. I., Hutsol, A. V., Hutsol, N. V., & Usata, O. I. (2010). Morfolohichni osoblyvosti orhaniv travnoi ta endokrynnoi system svynei pry zghodovuvanni fermentnoho preparatu mek-btu-3. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats VNAU. Hodivlia tvaryn ta tekhnolohiia kormiv, 4(44), 116 (in Ukrainian).
Mohammadigheisar, M., & Kim, I. H. (2017). Phytobiotics in poultry and swine nutrition – a review. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 17(1), 1–8. doi: 10.1080/1828051X.2017.1350120.
Pandey, A. K., Kumar, P., & Saxena, M. J. (2019). Feed Additives in Animal Health. In: Gupta R., Srivastava A., Lall R. (eds) Nutraceuticals in Veterinary Medicine. Springer, Cham. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-04624-8_23.
Pivtorak, J., Bogdan, I., & Vinnichenko, G. (2016). Fatlening and meat qualities of swine during feding up with probiotic additives “PROPYGplv” as a part of the ration. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies. Series: Agricultural Sciences, 18(2), 13–17. doi: 10.15421/nvlvet6703.
Plokhynskyi, N. A. (1969). Rukovodstvo po byometryy dlia zootekhnykov [Guide forbiometrics for livestock]. Moskow: Kolos (in Ukrainian).
Stoianovskyi, V. H, Kamratska, O. I, Kolomiiets, I. A., & Matsiuk, O. I. (2014). Synbiotyky dlia porosiat mekhanizm dii. perevahy zastosuvannia. NV LNU veterynarnoi medytsyny ta biotekhnolohii. Seriia: Veterynarni nauky, 16(60), 314–320 (in Ukrainian).
Abstract views: 67 PDF Downloads: 76