Influence of root dressings on the yield of tomato hybrid in spring film greenhouses


Keywords: productivity, indeterminate hybrid, biologics, protected cultivation, technology, growth regulator

Abstract

Vegetable production by way of protected cultivation is currently developing in Ukraine as a dynamic and effective branch of agriculture. This is extremely important for providing the population with vegetables rich in vitamins and minerals, although the development of this branch does not provide for all of the population's needs. One of the ways to increase vegetable production is to increase the yield of protected cultivation cultures; this may be achieved with the well-grounded use of growth stimulants. To solve the problem of increasing the yield of the culture it is necessary in scientific and practical vegetable growing to research the influence of a root application of growth stimulants on tomato yield in the conditions of protected cultivation, particularly in spring film greenhouses. During the study, the plants were treated according to general recommendations for vegetable cultures. The article presents experimental data of three-year research on the use of biologically active natural substances, among which are Radifarm, Viva, Potassium humate and Kornevin, obtained during the cultivation of indeterminate type Signora F1 tomato hybrid. The study determines the phenologic and biometric properties of plants and establishes that the parameters of tomato plants had significant differences of biometrics when biologics were used. The research revealed the consistent patterns of using growth stimulants changing the formation of tomato yield. Using Radifarm biological resulted in a 28.6 % yield increase compared to the clean sample. The study established the effective influence of used biologics on the content of dry matter and main chemicals in tomato fruits. Among the researched biologics, using Radifarm provided the highest content of dry matter and sugar, while Kornevin provided the highest content of ascorbic acid. Economic calculations showed the high effectiveness of biologics used for root applications, especially of the Radifarm biological. It provided the highest yield and cash proceeds – 22.9 kg/m2 and 233 UAH respectively, which is 25.5 % higher than the control group. Years of research established that using biologics that stimulate root system growth provides increases in yield and profitability level to the producers.

References

Ali, H. H., & Taha, K. K. (2016). Effect of Three Plant Extracts on Controlling of Tomato Damping-off Disease. ZANCO Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 28, 1–6. doi: 10.21271/zjpas.v28i4.1045.

Baka, Z. (2014). Biological control of the predominant seed-borne fungi of tomato by using plant extracts. J. Phytopathol. Pst. Mgmt. 1(3), 10–22. URL: http://ppmj.net/index.php/ppmj/article/view/15.

Baka, Z., & Rashad, Y. (2016). Alternative control of early blight of tomato using plant extracts from Acacia nilotica, Achillea fragrantissima and Calotropis procera. Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 55(1), 121–129. doi: 10.14601/Phytopathol_Mediterr-17161.

Boiko, L. (2020), Suchasni tendentsii rozvytku ovochevoi haluzi v umovakh yevrointehratsii Ukrainy. [Modern tendencies in the development of vegetable industry under conditions of Ukraine's euro-integration]. Agrosvit, 6, 69–76. doi: 10.32702/2306-6792.2020.6.69 (in Ukrainian).

Bondarenko, H. L., & Yakovenko, K. I. (2001). Metodyka doslidnoi spravy v ovochivnytstvi i bashtannytstvi. [Experimental methodology in vegetable growing and melon growing]. 3-e vyd. Kharkiv: “Osnova” (in Ukrainian).

Buinyi, O. V., & Kuriata, V. H. (2018). Vplyv 1-NOK na produktyvnist tomativ. [Influence of 1-NOC on tomato productivity]. Ovochivnytstvo, 1, 48–52. doi: 10.31395/2310-0478-2018-1-48-52 (in Ukraini-an).

Dospehov, B. A. (1985). Metodika polevogo opyta. [Field experiment technique]. M.: Agropromizdat (in Russian).

El-Eshmawiy, Kh. H., & Glala, A. A. (2019). Productivity and economic efficiency of application induced resistance technique in autumn tomato production. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Social Sciences, 32(5), 3949–3958. doi: 10.21608/jaess.2007.47244.

Glala, A. A., Ezzo, M. I., & Abdalla, A. M. (2010). Influence of plant growth promotion rhizosphere-bacteria “PGPR” enrichment and some alternative nitrogen organic sources on tomato. Acta Hortic, 852, 131–138. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2010.852.14.

Hanafy, A., & El-Emary, G. (2019). Role of Azolla Pinnata Biofertilizer Extract in Producing Healthy Tomatoes. Asian Journal of Research in Biochemis-try, 3(3), 1–8. doi: 10.9734/AJRB/2018/46785.

Hernández-Ochoa, J. S., Levin, L., Hernández-Luna, C., Contreras-Cordero, J. F., Niño-Medina, G., Chávez-Montes, A., et al. (2019). Antagonistic Potential of Macrolepiota sp. Against Alternaria Solani as Causal Agent of Early Blight Disease in Tomato Plants. Gesunde Pflanzen, 72, 69–76. doi: 10.1007/s10343-019-00484-4.

Heuvelink, E. (ed.). (2005). Tomatoes (Crop Production Science in Horticulture). USA: CABI Publishing.

Leshchenko, L. O., & Sievidov, V. P. (2005). Suchasnyi stan ta tendentsii rozvytku ovochivnytstva v Ukraini. [Current state and development trends of vegetable growing in Ukraine]. Visnyk KhNAU. Seriia: ekonomichni nauky, 3, 317–326 (in Ukrainian).

Naika, S., Jeude, J., Goffau, M. et al. (2005). Cultivation of tomato production, processing and marketing. Digigrafi, Wageningen, Netherlands.

Nikonchuk, N. V. (2012). Vplyv biolohichno aktyvnykh rechovyn na vrozhainist ta yakist tomativ. [Influence of biologically active substances on the yield and quality of tomatoes]. Visnyk ahrarnoi nauky Prychornomoria, 2, 160–163 (in Ukrainian).

Olk, D., Dinnes, D., Scoresby, J., Callaway, C., & Darlington, J. (2018). Humic products in agriculture: potential benefits and research challenges – a review. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 18, 2881–2891. doi: 10.1007/s11368-018-1916-4.

Sievidova, I. O. (2013). Vplyv yakosti ovochevoi produktsii na konkurentospromozhnist ovochivnytstva. [The influence of the quality of vegetable products on the competitiveness of vegetable growing]. Visnyk LNAU. Ser. “Ekonomika APK”, 20(1), 302–306 (in Ukrainian).

Sievidova, I. O. (2018). Faktory vplyvu na funktsionuvannia optovykh rynkiv ovochevoi produktsii. [Factors influencing the functioning of the wholesale markets for vegetable products]. Ahrosvit, 2, 28–32 (in Ukrainian).

State register of plant varieties suitable for dissemination in Ukraine in 2017 (2017). К.: Ministerstvo ahrarnoi polityky ta prodovolstva Ukrainy (in Ukrainian).

Yarovyi, H., Sievidov, V., & Sievidov, I. (2020). Urozhainist ta produktyvnist hibrydiv pomidora indeterminantnoho typu v plivkovykh teplytsiakh. [Productivity and productivity of indeterminate tomato hybrids in film greenhouses]. Ovochivnytstvo i bashtannytstvo, 67, 64–72. doi: 10.32717/0131-0062-2020-67-64-72 (in Ukrainian).

Ye, L., Zhao, X., Bao, E. et al. (2020). Bio-organic fertilizer with reduced rates of chemical fertilization improves soil fertility and enhances tomato yield and quality. Sci Rep, 10, 177. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56954-2.

Abstract views: 14
PDF Downloads: 6
Published
2020-09-21
How to Cite
Yarovyi, H., Sievidov, I., & Sievidov, V. (2020). Influence of root dressings on the yield of tomato hybrid in spring film greenhouses. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies. Series: Agricultural Sciences, 22(93), 55-59. https://doi.org/10.32718/nvlvet-a9310