SEMASIOLOGICAL CONTENT OF METHOD IN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHES


  • N. Fischuk Vinnitsa National Agrarian University
Keywords: methods, ways, interpretation, classification, laws, principles, graduate work, scientific category, phenomenon

Abstract

Differences in the understanding of the concept of «methods» and their classification, that predetermines the relevance of the problem, are ascertained.

Methods as an attribute of any human activity and their multiversions are studied. Numerous examples of the interpretation of the term «methods of research» are given, semasiological concept of «method» in the context of scientific researches on the basis of dictionaries, encyclopaedias, scientific publications and tutorials is defined and analysed.

Binary content of research methods is assumed. The attempt of interpretation of this concept from the standpoint of practical work of the researcher, which means studying it as a phenomenon, on the one hand, and from the standpoint of theory, which means studying it as scientific category, on another hand, is made. In the first case, the methods are in direct connection with the functional elements of the study content. The method classification that is recommended for dissertation researches is offered to use while working on graduate work.

The necessity of further study of the problem of classification of research methods is demonstrated because of ambiguity of the interpretation of research methods and their classification in scientific publications.

 

References

Slipushko, O.M. (2007). Novyi slovnyk inshomovnykh sliv. Ukladannia i peredmova.. K.: Akonit (in Ukrainian).

Prokhorov, A.M. (1983). Sovetskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar. M.: Sov. Entsiklopedia (in Russian).

Kovaliova, G.V. (2005). Velykyi tlumachnyi slovnyk ukrainskoi movy. Kharkiv: Folio (in Ukrainian).

Surmin, Yu.P. (2006). Maysternia vchenogo: pidruchnyk dlia naukovtsia. K.: Navchalno–metodychnyi tsentr «Konsortsium z udoskonalennia menedzhment–osvity v Ukraini» (in Ukrainian).

Ponomarenko, A.A. (2011). Yak pidgotuvaty I zakhystyty dysertatsiiu na zdobuttia naukovogo stupenia. Metodychni porady. 5–e vydannia, vypravlene i dopovnene. K.: Vydavnytstvo «Toloka» (in Ukrainian).

Andriichuk, V.G. (2016). Sutnisnyi aspect metodologii naukovykh doslidzhen. Ekonomika APK. 7, 87–94 (in Ukrainian).

Ganin, V.I., Ganina, N.V., Gurova, K.D. (2008). Metodologiia sotsialno–ekonomichnykh doslidzhen. navch.posib. K.: «Tsentr uchbovoi literatury» (in Ukrainian).

Iermakov, O.Yu., Pogrischuk, G.B., Chornodon, V.I. (2009). Osnovy metodologii naukovykh doslidzhen: navch.posib. – Ternopil: «Pidruchnyky I posibnyky» (in Ukrainian).

Kandyba, A.M. (2007). Menedzhment naukovogo doslidzhennia: navch.posib. – K.: Agrarna nauka

Klymenko, M.O., Feschenko, V.P., Vozniuk, N.M. (2010). Osnovy ta metodologiia naukovykh doslidzhen: navch.posib. K.: Agrarna osvita (in Ukrainian).

Krushelnytska, O.V. (2009). Metodologiia ta organizatsiia naukovykh doslidzhen: navch.posib. K.: Kondor (in Ukrainian).

Mochernyi, S.V. (2001). Metodologiia ekonomichnykh doslidzhen. Lviv: Svit (in Ukrainian).

Tsekhmistrova, G.S. (2003). Osnovy naukovykh doslidzhen: navch. posib. K.: Vydavnychyi dim «Slovo» (in Ukrainian).

Galchynskyi, A.S. (2010). Ekonomichna metodologiia. Logika onovlennia: Kurs lektsii. K.: «ADEF – Ukraina» (in Ukrainian).

Abstract views: 22
PDF Downloads: 63
Published
2016-09-06
How to Cite
Fischuk, N. (2016). SEMASIOLOGICAL CONTENT OF METHOD IN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHES. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies. Series Economical Sciences, 18(2), 165-168. https://doi.org/10.15421/nvlvet6932
Section
Economic efficiency of production and agricultural products alteration