• L.M. Gordiychuk Lviv National University of veterinary medicine and biotechnology named after S. Gzhytskyj
Keywords: high risk, occupational safety, occupational injuries, classification, psychology, causes hazards


The article deals with the problem of accidents and injuries in modern production based organizational psychological causes dangerous situations and accidents.

Practice shows that the main causes of injuries and accidents often associated with engineering omissions, shortcomings in the organization of work on equipment operation, incorrect assessment of the situation in the workplace, that is, the reason lies in the man, the so–called «human factor». From the psychological stability depend worker as his own safety and the safety of the whole enterprise. Only when using an integrated approach to predicting injuries considering the psychological stability of the production personnel may significantly reduce injuries at the plant and increase safety, as psychological stability is the reserve, which is currently not fully used in practice.

Special attention is given a wide range of personality traits, social circumstances and working conditions forming psychological reasons deliberate violation of safety in the operation and repair of agricultural machinery. Creating the most safe and healthy working conditions is one of the most important tasks. This task is closely linked with the improvement of methods of management of the workplace.

The largest number of industrial accidents due to the incompetence of leaders and experts in matters of safety, violation of legislation on labor protection. To prevent the violation of safety rules should apply measures of organizational and technical nature, which exclude the possibility of, or conditions for execution of dangerous actions deprive working opportunities to choose between dangerous and safe ways of working; strengthen educational, advocacy and training activities aimed at the formation of the desired behavior.



Kukin, P.P., Lapin V.L., Ponomarev, N.L. (2003). Proizvodstvennaya bezopasnost i okhrana truda. M.: Vysshaya. shk. ( in Russian).

Kukin, P.P., Lapin, V.L., Ponomarev, N.L., Serdyukov, N.I. (2002) Bezopasnost zhiznedeyatelnosti. Bezopasnost tekhnologicheskikh protsessov i proizvodstv. Okhrana truda. M.: Vysshaya. shk. ( in Russian).

Skrypchenko, O.V., Dolynska, L.V., Ohorodniichuk, Z.V. (2002). Zahalna psykholohiia: Navch. posib. K.: A.H.N. (in Ukrainian).

Maksymenkо, S.D. (2000). Zahalna psykholohiia: pidruch. dlia stud. vyshch. navch. Zakladiv. K.: Forum (in Ukrainian).

Zotov, B.I., Kurdiumov, V.I. (2006). Bezpeka zhyttiediialnosti na vyrobnytstvi. M.: Kolos (in Ukrainian).

Tkachuk, K.N., Zatsarnyi, V.V., Sabarno, R.V. (2009). Okhorona pratsi ta promyslova bezpeka: navch. posib. (in Ukrainian).

Pistun, I.P. (2010). Okhorona pratsi (Zakonodavstvo. Orhanizatsiia roboty): navch. posib. Lviv: «Triada plius» (in Ukrainian).

Abstract views: 13
PDF Downloads: 40
How to Cite
Gordiychuk, L. (2016). PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS WARNING ACCIDENTAL ACCIDENTS. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies. Series Economical Sciences, 18(2), 198-200. Retrieved from