Main requirements for food safety management systems under international standards: BRС, IFS, FSSC 22000, ISO 22000, Global GAP, SQF

Keywords: standards, requirements, НАССР, BRС, IFS, FSSC 22000, ISO 22000, Global GAP, SQF, food safety management system, safety and quality.


The research analyzed the international standards basic requirements structure: BRС, IFS, FSSC 22000, ISO 22000, Global GAP, SQF for food safety management systems that realize principles of the HACCP concept. A comparative analysis of the international standards basic requirements for food safety management systems has identified that the requirements structure is identified as an interconnected set of rules, system-structured processes for the purposeful prevention of hazard risks at certain stages or in the food business. The main differences between the standards are in the modification of approaches to the implementation of the HACCP principles, the interpretation of the basic concepts and definitions, the detailed requirements, the application of their own programs of the processes and procedures identification that allow to ensure that the results correspond to the set task. Other differences in standards are at the level of system-elemental, structural, and functional components. Standards have the same goals, so their requirements are similar and have a certain level of identity, much of the difference is at the audit level, which uses different levels, system points and categories. The requirements of all standards are structured and differentiated into mandatory and recommended blocks, which enables companies to gradually implement changes. IFS, FSSC, ISO standards have high level structure (HLS), which is common basis for ISO standards that greatly simplifies the integration of several systems simultaneously in monitoring, action adjustments, audit processes. The GlobalGAP standard requirement system, unlike other considered ones, has a narrow target, which has provided a detailed description, for tracking, a set of indicators for quality and safety including genetically modified organisms and allergens, however, it is compatible with others. Taking into account the globalization of markets conditions in analyzing the international standards requirements, their correlation with global safety-related criteria such as: implementation of the HACCP principles, recognition of the standard GFSI,  providing traceability principles and mechanisms and prerequisites for programs (PRP), validity of the certificate, coherence of processes in the creation of integrated systems with standards ISO 9001, ISO 14001, OHSAS 18000.


Pro osnovni pryncypy ta vymogy do bezpechnosti ta jakosti harchovyh produktiv. Zakon vid vid 23.12.1997 № 771/97-VR. (redakcija vid 16.01.2020): [Veb-sajt]. Kyi'v, 2020. URL: ua/laws/show/771/97-%D0%B2%D1%80 (data zvernennja 21.01.2020) (in Ukrainian).

Pro zagal'ni pryncypy i vymogy harchovogo za-konodavstva, Reglament JeS 178/2002 vid 28.01.2002. URL: (data zvernennja 23.01.2020) (in Ukrainian).

Tolok, G. (2015). Shljahy vprovadzhennja systemy NASSR: ukrai'ns'ki realii'. Prodovol'cha industrija APK, 6, 4–6 (in Ukrainian).

Kushwah, A., & Kumar, R. (2017). HACCP – ITS NEED AND PRACTICES. Acta Chemica Malaysia, 1(2), 01–05. doi: 10.26480/acmy.02.2017.01.05.

Vorobiov, K., Hurzhii, N., & Lysenko, M. (2019). Safety of coffee production as the main competitive advantage of the company in the market. Management and ent repreneurship: trends of development, 4(10), 79–93. doi: 10.26661/2522-1566/2019-4/10-07.

Jageljuk, S. V., & Cydoruk, A. V. (2015). Jevropejs'ki standarty jakosti ta bezpechnosti. Tovaroznavchyj visnyk, 8, 124–129 (in Ukrainian).

Kuzoma, V., & Pavliuk, S. (2019). Implementation of the Food Safety Management System Based on the Concept of HACCP. Modern Economics, 14(2019), 115–120. doi: 10.31521/modecon.V14(2019)-19.

Himicheva, G. I., Zenkin, M. A., & Skalyga, T. M. (2015). Analiz suchasnyh pryncypiv i pidhodiv do ocinky jakosti ta bezpechnosti harchovoi' produkcii'. Visnyk KNUTD, 6(92), 156–163 (in Ukrainian).

Hulebak, K. L., & Schlosser, W. (2002). Hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP) history and conceptual overview. Risk Anal., 22(3), 547–552. doi: 10.1111/0272-4332.00038.

Shhodo gigijeny harchovyh produktiv. Reglament JeS № 852/2004 vid 29 kvitnja 2004 r. URL: (data zvernennja 24.01.2020) (in Russian).

About BRC Global Standards. Overview. [Website]. 2018. URL: (viewed on: 03.02.2020).

International Featured Standards – IFS [Website]. 2018. URL: (viewed on: 03.02.2020).

GLOBAL G.A.P. – The Worldwide Standard for Good Agricultural Practices. [Website]. 2018. URL: (viewed on: 03.02.2020).

Legal status of FSSC 22000. Certified Organizations. [Website]. 2018. URL: documents/about-us.xml?lang=en (viewed on: 04.02.2020).

ISO/TC 34/SC 17 Management systems for food safety [Website]. 2018. URL: home/tc34sc17 (viewed on: 05.02.2020).

ISO 22000 revision Why was ISO 22000 revised? [Website]. 2018. URL: (viewed on: 05.02.2020).

What is GFSI. About GFSI [Website]. 2018. URL: (viewed on: 05.02.2020).

Aung, M. M., & Chang, Y. S. (2014). Traceability in a food supply chain: Safety and quality perspectives. Food Control, 39, 172–184. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.11.007.

Pro zatverdzhennja Vymog shhodo rozrobky, vprova-dzhennja ta zastosuvannja postijno dijuchyh proce-dur, zasnovanyh na pryncypah Systemy upravlinn-ja bezpechnistju harchovyh produktiv (NASSR). Nakaz № 590 vid 1.10.2012. iz zminamy № 429 vid 17.10.2015. Kyi'v: Min-vo agrarnoi' polityky ta prod-ovol'stva. URL: show/z1704-12#n13 (data zvernennja 08.02.2020) (in Ukrainian).

Abstract views: 901
PDF Downloads: 542
How to Cite
Bomba, M., & Susol, N. (2020). Main requirements for food safety management systems under international standards: BRС, IFS, FSSC 22000, ISO 22000, Global GAP, SQF. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies. Series: Food Technologies, 22(93), 18-25.