A2 milk as an alternative to goat milk in yoghurt production
The article discusses and analyzes the prospects for the use of cow’s milk A2 as an alternative to goat milk in the production of yoghurt. It has been analyzed that goat’s milk is less allergenic than cow’s milk. The genotype of A1 and A2 milk samples was determined using molecular biological analysis of allele recognition by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in real time. The organoleptic characteristics of yoghurts made from cow’s milk A1, A2, goat’s milk, from a mixture of goat’s and cow’s milk of different genotypes were studied and presented in the work in the form of a profile analysis using the significance coefficients of each individual descriptor (color, smell, taste, appearance and consistency). The physicochemical parameters (protein and fat content) of yoghurts made from cow’s milk A1, A2, goat’s milk, from a mixture of goat’s and cow’s milk of different genotypes were determined. High fat and protein content was found in sample № 3 made from goat milk. The protein content is 3.99 g per 100 g of product, fat – 4.1 g per 100 g of product. Sample No. 2 is made from A2 cow’s milk contains 0.5 g per 100 g of product less protein and 0.6 g per 100 g of product less fat than sample No. 1 made from A1 cow milk. The best result in terms of protein and fat content in the sample of yogurt № 4, made from a mixture of cow and goat milk. This paper presents a comparative analysis of the energy value of yoghurts based on cow’s milk A1, A2, goat’s milk, from a mixture of goat’s and cow’s milk of different genotypes. It should be noted that the highest numerical values of the level of balance in terms of organoleptic indicators and energy value were obtained by samples of yoghurts made from a mixture of cow’s A2 milk and goat’s milk. Studies have shown that yoghurts made from a mixture of goat and cow milk meet the requirements of the standard.
Didukh, N. A., & Romanchenko, S. V. (2010). Obgruntuvannia parametriv fermentatsii molochnoi osnovy u biotekhnolohii kefiru dytiachoho kharchuvannia. Kharchova nauka i tekhnolohiia, 2, 30–33. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Khnit_2010_2_11 (in Ukrainian).
DSTU 4343:2004 (2005). Yohurty. Zahalni tekhnichni umovy. Kyiv (in Ukrainian).
DSTU 8552:2015 (2016). Moloko ta molochni produkty. Metody vyznachannia volohy i sukhoi rechovyny rechovyn. Kyiv (in Ukrainian).
DSTU ISO 2446:2019 (ISO 2446:2008, IDT). Moloko. Vyznachennia vmistu zhyru. Kyiv, 2019 (in Ukrainian).
Fatihov, A. G., & Haertdinov, R. A. (2017). Vlijanie urovnja soderzhanija αs1- i β- kazeinov v koz'em moloke na ego allergennye, termostabil'nye i syrodel'-cheskie svojstva. Uchenye zapiski Kazanskoj gosu-darstvennoj akademii veterinarnoj mediciny im. N. Je. Baumana, 2(230), 163–167. URL: https://readera.org/ 14288931 (in Russian).
Fedotova, M. M., Ogorodova, L. M., Fѐdorova, O. S., & Evdokimova, T. A. (2011). Molekuljarnye i jepidemio-logicheskie osnovy allergii k belkam korov'ego moloka. Bjulleten' sibirskoj mediciny, 10(6), 86–92. doi: 10.20538/1682-0363-2011-6-86-92.
Gorlov, I. F., Sycheva, O. V., & Kononova, L. V. (2016). Beta-kazein: izvestnyj, no ne poznannyj. Molochnoe i mjasnoe skotovodstvo, 6, 18–19. URL: http://www.skotovodstvo.com/BETA-KAZEIN-IZVESTNYI%2C-NO-NE-POZNANNYI-STR-18-/ (in Russian).
Jenness, R., & Parkash, S. (1990). Lack of a fat globule clustering agent in goats milk. J. Dairy Sci., 54(1), 123–124. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(71)85790-9.
Jung, T.-H., Hwang, H.-J., Yun, S.-S., Lee, W.-J., Kim, J.-W., Ahn, J.-Y., Jeon, W.-M., & Han, K.-S. (2017). Hypoallergenic and Physicochemical Properties of the A2 β-Casein Fractionof Goat Milk. Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources, 37(6), 940–947. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2017.37.6.940.
Kamiński, S., Cieslińska, A., & Kostyra, E. (2007). Polymorphism of bovine beta-casein and its potential effect on human health. J Appl Genet, 48(1), 89–98. doi: 10.1007/BF03195213.
Kovaljuk, N. V., Sacuk, V. F., Machul'skaja, E. V., & Shahnazarova, Ju. Ju. (2018). Proizvodstvo moloka A2 – perspektivnoe napravlenie povyshenija rentabel'nostiiotrasli molochnogo skotovodstva. Tematicheskij nomer “Genetika i plemennoe delo”, 5, 22–23. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/proizvodstvo-moloka-a2-perspektivnoe-napravlenie-povysheniya-rentabelnosti-otrasli-molochnogo-skotovodstva/viewer (in Russian).
Park, Y. W., & Haenlein, G. F. W. (2007). Goat Milk, Its Products and Nutrition. In Y. H. Hui, Ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Handbook of Food Products Manufacturing (rr. 447-486). New York, NY.
Ryzhkova, T. N., Dyukareva, G. I., Heyda, I. M., & Goncharova, I. I. (2019). Comparative characteristics of physical and chemical indices of goat and cows milk for commercial use. Veterinary science, technologies of animal husbandry and nature management, 3, 213–224. doi: 10.31890/vttp.2019.03.29.
Skidan, I. N., Guljaev, A. E., & Kaznacheev, K. S. (2015). Zhirovye globuly kak determinanty pishhevoj i bio-logicheskoj cennosti koz'ego moloka. Voprosy pitanija, 84(2), 81–95. URL: http://voprosy-pitaniya.ru/ru/jarticles_diet/350.html?SSr=2401339 ee421ffffffff27c__07e0021c15181d-538 (in Russian).
TU U 01.4-04718013-001:2020 (2020). Moloko A2 nezbyrane. Tekhnichni umovy. Sumy (in Ukrainian).
Abstract views: 75 PDF Downloads: 41