Sanitary and microbiological indicators of drinking water of livestock farms

Keywords: livestock farms, drinking water, sanitary and microbiological parameters, microorganisms


The article presents data on the study of sanitary and microbiological indicators of drinking water of livestock farms. The criteria for sanitary and hygienic assessment of water from a microbiological point of view are the total amount of microflora and the presence or absence of Escherichia coli, the definition of pathogenic microorganisms, including salmonella, which characterize its fitness for consumption by animals. The main purpose of sanitary and microbiological research is to provide animals, the population with quality water, for which hygienic assessment of water of infectious safety for human and animal health is carried out. Full supply of livestock enterprises with good quality water is one of the main prerequisites for successful production of quality and safe livestock products. The goal of the work. In connection with this, the purpose of our research was to investigate the sanitary and microbiological parameters of the drinking water of livestock farms. Sanitary and microbiological studies of drinking water sources for animals were conducted. It was found that in the studied samples, the number of bacteria of the group of Escherichia coli (BGKP) in 1 liter of water (coli-index) ranges from 200 to 140 000 and more. Of all the samples tested for this indicator, only 39.4% of the reservoirs met the normative indicator. Water samples from artesian wells in 12.3% of cases did not meet the sanitary and hygienic requirements for the amount of BGKP. When carrying out sanitary-microbiological analysis of samples of water from various elements of water supply systems with respect to conditionally pathogenic microflora, it was found that the samples that were collected from the wafers had the highest degree of microbial contamination. The total number of microorganisms was 107 CFU/cm3, and the coli index exceeded 240 thousand units. Examining the water samples found that 40% of the samples had an increased amount of enterobacteria. From the samples tested, 100 cultures of conditionally pathogenic microflora were isolated, including E. faecalis – 32%, E. coli – 23%, E. cloacae – 9%, E. faecium – 11% and K. pneumoniae – 4%, of which 59.3 respectively: 30.4; 33.3; 54.5 and 75% had hemolytic properties. E. faecalis showed resistance to erythromycin, cefuroxime, benzylpenicillin, ampicillin, tetracycline, vancomycin; E. faecium – to vancomycin, ciprofloxacin, tetracycline; representatives of the family Enterobacteriacea (E. coli, K. pneumoniae, E. cloacae) – mainly to amoxicillin, streptomycin, levomycetin.


Download data is not yet available.


Andrushchuk, I.L. (2015). Chysta voda – osnova zdorovia tvaryn. Zh. Silskyi hospodar, 4–6, 34–36 (in Ukrainian).

Dong, J., Wang, G., Yan, H., Xu, J., & Zhang, X. (2015). A survey of smart water quality monitoring system. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22(7), 4893–4906. doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-4026-x.

Glasgow, H.B., Burkholder, J.M., Reed, R.E., Lewitus, A.J., & Kleinman, J.E. (2004) Real-time remote monitoring of water quality: a review of current applications, and advancements in sensor, telemetry, and computing technologies. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 300(1), 409–448. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2004.02.022.

Gómez, J.A.D., Alonso, C.A., & García, A.A. (2011) Remote sensing as a tool for monitoring water quality parameters for Mediterranean Lakes of European Union water framework directive (WFD) and as a system of surveillance of cyanobacterial harmful algae blooms (SCyanoHABs). Environ Monit Assess, 181(1–4), 317–334.

Helbling, D., & VanBriesen, J. (2009). Modeling Residual Chlorine Response to a Microbial Contamination Event in Drinking Water Distribution Systems. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 135(10), 918–927. doi: 10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0000080.

Hihiienichni vymohy do vody pytnoi, pryznachenoi dlia spozhyvannia liudynoiu. DSanPiN 2.2.4-171-10: Nakaz MOZ Ukrainy vid 12.05.2012, №400 (zi zminamy vid 15.08.2011) (in Ukrainian).

Hirol, M.M., & Kovalskyi, V.Ye. (2008). Problemy yakosti vody v vodoprovidnykh merezhakh. Vodopostachannia ta vodovidve-dennia. Vyrobnycho-praktychnyi zhurnal, 2, 1–21 (in Ukrain-ian).

Holovko, A.M., & Rublenko, I.O. (2010). Veterynarna sanitarna mikrobiolohiia: navch. posib. K.: Ahrarna osvita (in Ukrainian).

Karas', A.V. (2009). Jekologicheskij monitoring vodoistochnikov i jeffektivnost' ispol'zovanitja uluchshenoj vody v uslovijah svinovodcheskogo kompleksa: Avtoref. diss. kand. s.-h. nauk. Vitebsk (in Russian).

Laptiev, Yu.O. (2012). Znachennia pytnoi vody u suchasnomu svynarstvi. Efektyvne tvarynnytstvo, 7, 62–64 (in Ukrainian).

Sokoliuk, V.M., Kozii, V.I., Kozii, N.V., & Zasiekin, D.A. (2011). Otsinka yakosti vody ta system vodopostachannia u kompleksi preventyvnoi veterynarnoi medytsyny. Suchasne ptakhivnytstvo, 5–6(102–103), 40–45 (in Ukrainian).

Vajsburd, A.A. (2014). Sanitarno-gigienicheskie trebovanija k kachestvu vody dlja zhivotnovodcheskih i pticevodcheskih kompleksov. Chast' 1. Harakteristiki kachestva. Naukovo-praktychnyi zhurnal Suchasna veterynarna medytsyna, 3(45), 52–55 (in Russian).

Zapolskyi, A.K. (2005). Vodopostachannia, vodovidvedennia ta yakist vody. Pidruchnyk. K.: Vyshcha shkola (in Ukrainian).

Zasiekin, D.A., Solomon, V.V., Kucheruk, M.D. ta in. (2009). Vplyv nanochastynok sribla na mikrobne zabrudnennia vody. Zdorovia tvaryn i liky, 21, 15 (in Ukrainian).

Abstract views: 107
PDF Downloads: 77
How to Cite
Fotina, T., Nazarenko, S., & Fotin, A. (2019). Sanitary and microbiological indicators of drinking water of livestock farms. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies. Series: Veterinary Sciences, 21(95), 112-116.